The first picture is how this premolar arrived (with the patient) to my office. Discharge was present through the gums from a chronic abscess. Looks like a radiolucent post was placed practically to the apex. There’s some remnant gutta-percha or cement mid-root and probably an apical perforation at the base of the post.

The tooth was retreated over a couple of appointments. Sure enough there was a perforation at the apex of the root, but laterally. I was never able to regain the true canal beyond the perf. A carbon fiber post was removed, Calcium Hydroxide was used as an interappointment intracanal dressing, and then MTA (Mineral Trioxide Aggregate) was used to fully obturate the canal.

There is a 21 month interval between the two films. Osseous healing is progressing well, and no mucosal lesions were evident at the time of the second film.

This case also serves as an example of the fact that a 1-year recall on endodontic cases does not provide enough time to properly evaluate healing. From a strict radiographic interpretation, this case has not healed and is therefore not currently a success. One strike against the relevance or clinical significance of that Cochrane Review.

By the way, I did address the molar’s obvious periodontal issue verbally. The patient is aware of a guarded long-term prognosis there.